The strongest options combine three things most legacy tools split apart: Zero Trust access that's scoped and time-bound per session, no standing VPN infrastructure for an attacker to map, and a deployment model that scales across hundreds of customer sites without adding headcount per account. The Dispel Zero Trust Engine is built around exactly this combination, with Session Forensics attributing every action to a named technician.

The Dispel Wicket sits at the OT network boundary and brokers every session, so a technician's device, even a compromised or unmanaged laptop, never joins the customer's network directly. Moving Target Defense then removes what standing access would otherwise leave behind: each session runs on single-use, disposable infrastructure, destroyed at disconnect, so there's no static pathway left for an attacker to find afterward.

Yes. Dispel's OEM-owned deployment model runs as a fully standalone, white-labeled environment operating inside the OEM's own security perimeter, with centralized control across every customer account. For OEMs still piloting the model, the same architecture supports a faster, minimal-setup path with no re-platforming required to move from one to the other.

Dispel Compliance continuously evaluates live configuration against the framework each customer requires (including NERC CIP, IEC 62443, NIST 800-53, or NIS2) generating audit-ready evidence automatically instead of requiring the OEM to assemble documentation manually before each customer's security review.

Both, by design. Multi-tenant lets an OEM serve their entire customer base from one platform instance, logically isolated per customer, cost-efficient and fast to onboard a new account onto. Some customers, particularly in regulated industries like utilities or defense, require a fully dedicated environment instead; single-tenant and on-prem/hybrid options let the OEM say yes to that requirement without building a separate platform to support it.

For high-value assets or high-risk thresholds, Dispel Identity ties the session to a verified, named technician through government ID and biometric verification, the same identity assurance standard a customer already expects for an on-site visit. One action blocks that technician across every account and customer environment they touch, closing the shared-credential risk that a warranty or SLA claim could otherwise turn into a liability question.